Home- vs Office-Based Narrowband UV-B Phototherapy for Patients With Psoriasis

JAMA Dermatology

Clinical Summary

View source

What was studied

A pragmatic, open-label, multicenter noninferiority randomized trial at 42 US dermatology practices compared 12 weeks of home narrowband UV-B with guided dosimetry vs routine office-based narrowband UV-B for plaque or guttate psoriasis in patients aged 12 years and older.

Key findings

At week 12, clear/almost clear skin (PGA ≤1) occurred in 129/393 (32.8%) with home phototherapy vs 100/390 (25.6%) with office phototherapy, and DLQI ≤5 in 206/393 (52.4%) vs 131/390 (33.6%); home phototherapy was noninferior overall and across all skin phototypes. Adherence was higher with home treatment (202/393 [51.4%] vs 62/390 [15.9%]) while persistent erythema per treatment was more frequent (466/7957 [5.9%] vs 46/3934 [1.2%]); no discontinuations occurred due to adverse events.

Study limitations

Open-label pragmatic design. The abstract does not report the noninferiority margin or quantify the indirect cost differences; the adherence definition is not specified.

Clinical implications

Home narrowband UV-B was as effective as office-based therapy at 12 weeks, including across all skin phototypes, with higher adherence but more persistent erythema; both were well tolerated. Consider home phototherapy as an effective alternative when access or patient burden limits office-based care.